Written by Lisa Selman-Holman, Vice President of Education & Quality, McBee
Performance Year one is complete for Value-Based Purchasing (VBP), and we are waiting for the final Interim Performance Report (IPR) to be posted in July before the annual reports reveal whether your agency is getting a payment incentive for all your hard work, or if your money will be used to pay someone else for their efforts. Value-Based Purchasing is budget neutral so if the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) gives money to the high achievers, that money will come from those whom did not do so well. This makes CMS value-based purchasing all the more critical to your practice’s sustainable profitability, and ensuring your Balue-Based Purchasing is in order can save you lost revenue later.
Value-Based Purchasing began its first performance year in January 2023, tracking agency performance in three areas — OASIS-based, claims-based, and HHCAHPS. Agencies (with a few exceptions) were compared to the baseline year of 2022. Agencies can gain achievement points by outscoring the median performance of their cohort in 2022, and they can earn improvement points by improving compared to their own 2022 performance.
In terms of value-based purchasing, CMS uses the higher of the point values as the agency’s care points. Some agencies are struggling in one area, and some are struggling in all areas. For example, we have seen agencies with good scores in acute-care hospitalization (ACH) and emergency department use (ED Use), great scores in the HHCAHPS but low scores in the OASIS-based realm. This indicates that their staff requires education in coding the OASIS because they are not scoring the patient accurately enough to satisfy requirements. The ACH score remains the most vexing at 26.25% of the total performance score (TPS).
In our recent webinar on improving ACH rates by drawing from industry best practices and research findings, we outlined strategies for mitigating ACH risks.
Strategies for Mitigating ACH Risks in Value-Based Purchasing
- Screening for risks, including social determinants of health
- Patient-specific care
- Proactive discharge planning
- Comprehensive case management
- Telephone follow-up
- Continuity of care
- Safety management
By adopting a multifaceted approach and integrating these strategies into their episode management programs, agencies can reduce ACH rates and improve patient satisfaction. In comparing ACH and ED Use to financial metrics like periods per episode and LUPA rates, we can identify key pain points that may be contributing to the ACH rates. Leveraging data analytics to track metrics, identify trends and guide performance improvement initiatives is a first step in developing strategies for keeping your patients at home.
Harnessing the power of data means that agencies can gain valuable insights into their operations, optimize resource allocation and drive continuous improvement. This is even more important with the upcoming changes to the measures in 2025, including the new Discharged to Community claims-based outcome.
Providing Expert Analysis to Turn Challenges into Achievements
McBee has reviewed well over 350 IPRs (Interim Performance Reports) and engaged in enlightening conversations about what works and what does not in Value-Based Purchasing. If you need assistance in understanding your reports, analyzing the results and digging deep into your data, call on McBee to help your agency strategize and recognize your rewards under Value-Based Purchasing.

About the Author
Lisa Selman-Holman, JD, BSN, RN, HCS-D, COS-C, VP of Education and Quality
Lisa Selman-Holman, JD, BSN, RN, HCS-D, COS-C, is the VP of Education & Quality at McBee, bringing over 35 years of expertise in home health and hospice. As a registered nurse and home care attorney, she specializes in regulatory compliance. Lisa has held various roles, from field nurse to executive, managing accreditation surveys, acquisitions, and regulatory crises. In 2004, she founded Selman-Holman & Associates, offering consulting, coding and OASIS review services. Lisa is a renowned educator, known for turning challenges into achievements. Joining McBee in 2021, she leads education initiatives at the Post-Acute Academy, providing courses for home health and hospice staff and executives, including clinical, regulatory and onboarding requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
CMS Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) is a Medicare initiative designed to reward healthcare providers for delivering high-quality care. Instead of focusing on the service volume, VBP incentivizes quality of care and patient outcomes. The program measures healthcare providers’ performance in patient satisfaction, clinical processes, and outcomes, among others, and compares them to national benchmarks or previous performance. Depending on the results, agencies can either receive a bonus or face a financial penalty.
- Enhancing Clinical Documentation: Accurate and comprehensive clinical documentation, especially in OASIS assessments, is crucial. Agencies should ensure that their staff is well-trained in coding and documentation to reflect the true condition of patients.
- Implementing Best Practices: Adopting evidence-based best practices in patient care, such as those related to acute-care hospitalization (ACH) reduction, can improve performance scores.
- Leveraging Data Analytics: By using data analytics, agencies can track performance metrics, identify trends, and address areas needing improvement. This proactive approach allows for timely interventions and performance enhancement.
- Providing Staff Education and Training: Ongoing education and training for clinical staff, particularly in areas like OASIS coding and patient-centered care, can lead to better performance in quality measures.
- Improving Patient Engagement: Engaging patients and caregivers through education, communication, and support can lead to higher patient satisfaction scores, which are a component of VBP.
- Optimizing Care Coordination: Enhancing care coordination, including discharge planning and follow-up, can reduce hospital readmissions and emergency department visits, positively impacting VBP performance.
Reducing acute-care hospitalization (ACH) rates is critical for success in the VBP program. Key strategies include:
- Risk Screening: Identify patients at high risk for hospitalization, including those with complex medical conditions or social determinants of health that may impact their care.
- Patient-Specific Care Plans: Develop individualized care plans that address the unique needs of each patient, focusing on prevention and early intervention.
- Proactive Discharge Planning: Ensure that discharge planning begins early and includes clear instructions for post-discharge care, follow-up appointments, and medication management.
- Comprehensive Case Management: Implement robust case management practices that monitor patients’ progress and coordinate care across different providers and settings.
- Telephone Follow-Up: Conduct follow-up calls after discharge to address any questions or issues, ensuring that patients adhere to their care plans and avoid complications.
- Continuity of Care: Ensure that patients receive continuous care, with seamless transitions between different care settings, to prevent gaps that could lead to hospitalization.
- Safety Management: Address safety concerns in the home or care environment, such as fall risks, medication errors, or inadequate support, to reduce the likelihood of emergency situations.
In the VBP program, CMS calculates both achievement and improvement points to evaluate an agency’s performance:
- Achievement Points: These are awarded based on how well an agency’s performance in a given year compares to the national median performance of all agencies during the baseline year. Agencies earn more points as they exceed the median performance levels set by CMS.
- Improvement Points: These are based on how much an agency’s performance has improved compared to its own baseline performance in the prior year. CMS calculates improvement by comparing current performance with past performance, rewarding agencies that demonstrate significant gains, even if they are not yet exceeding national benchmarks.
- Final Score: CMS uses the higher of the two point totals (achievement or improvement) as the final care points for each measure. This system ensures that agencies are rewarded for both maintaining high performance and making substantial progress over time.
OASIS-based, claims-based, and HHCAHPS measures are the core components of the CMS Value-Based Purchasing program:
- OASIS-Based Measures: These measures are derived from the Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS), which is a standardized tool used to assess the clinical status of patients receiving home health care. OASIS-based measures focus on functional improvement, symptom management, and patient safety. Accurate and consistent OASIS documentation is crucial for high performance in these measures.
- Claims-Based Measures: These measures are based on data extracted from Medicare claims, which include information about hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and other healthcare services. Claims-based measures assess the frequency of acute-care hospitalizations (ACH), emergency department use (ED Use), and other outcomes that reflect the quality and effectiveness of care.
- HHCAHPS Measures: The Home Health Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HHCAHPS) is a patient satisfaction survey that measures patients’ experiences with home health care. HHCAHPS scores contribute to VBP by reflecting the quality of patient-provider interactions, communication, and overall satisfaction with care.
Data analytics can enhance performance in the VBP program by providing actionable insights on:
- Identifying Trends: Analytics can help agencies identify trends in their performance data, such as patterns in ACH rates or patient satisfaction scores. Understanding these trends allows agencies to focus on specific areas needing improvement.
- Tracking Performance Metrics: Agencies can use data analytics to monitor key performance indicators (KPIs) over time, comparing current performance with historical data and national benchmarks. This real-time tracking enables timely interventions and course corrections.
- Targeting Interventions: By analyzing data, agencies can identify specific patient populations or care processes that are contributing to lower performance scores. Targeted interventions, such as focused staff training or process improvements, can be implemented to address these issues.
- Optimizing Resource Allocation: Data analytics can help agencies allocate resources more effectively by highlighting areas where additional staff, training, or technology investments may yield the greatest performance improvements.
- Supporting Decision-Making: Data-driven insights empower agency leaders to make informed decisions about care strategies, staffing, and operational changes that align with VBP goals and improve overall performance.
Agencies face several challenges in achieving high scores in the CMS Value-Based Purchasing program:
- Complexity of the Measures: The VBP program involves multiple complex measures, including OASIS-based, claims-based, and HHCAHPS, each requiring specific expertise and attention to detail. Managing and excelling in all these areas simultaneously can be challenging.
- Staff Training and Education: Ensuring that staff are properly trained in OASIS coding, patient care, and documentation is essential but can be difficult to maintain, especially with high staff turnover or resource constraints.
- Data Accuracy and Integrity: Accurate data collection and reporting are critical for VBP success. Inaccurate or incomplete data can lead to lower performance scores and missed opportunities for improvement points.
- Patient Population Variability: Agencies serving diverse patient populations with varying levels of complexity may find it challenging to achieve consistently high performance across all measures.
- Resource Limitations: Smaller agencies or those with limited resources may struggle to implement the necessary changes, technologies, or interventions required to improve performance in the VBP program.
- Regulatory Changes: The VBP program is subject to ongoing changes in measures and benchmarks, requiring agencies to stay informed and adapt quickly to new requirements, which can be a significant challenge.
The CMS Value-Based Purchasing program directly impacts payment incentives for healthcare agencies by linking a portion of their Medicare reimbursements to their performance on quality measures. Here’s how it works:
- Budget Neutrality: The VBP program is budget neutral, meaning that the total amount of Medicare payments remains constant across all agencies. To fund the bonuses for high-performing agencies, CMS reduces payments to agencies that perform below the set benchmarks.
- Incentive Payments: Agencies that achieve high performance scores, either through superior achievement or significant improvement compared to their baseline, can receive incentive payments. These payments are additional funds added to their standard Medicare reimbursements.
- Penalties: Conversely, agencies that perform below the established thresholds may face penalties in the form of reduced Medicare payments. These penalties are used to fund the incentive payments for better-performing agencies.
- Financial Impact: The financial impact of the VBP program can be significant. High-performing agencies can benefit from increased revenue, while those that do not meet the standards may experience financial losses. Therefore, participating agencies are highly motivated to improve their quality of care and patient outcomes to maximize their payment incentives.
As the CMS Value-Based Purchasing program evolves, changes to the measures and benchmarks are anticipated for 2025, including:
- New Measures: One significant change expected for 2025 is the introduction of the “Discharged to Community” claims-based outcome measure. This measure will assess the percentage of patients discharged from home health care to the community without a subsequent hospitalization or emergency department visit within a specific timeframe.
- Revised Benchmarks: CMS may adjust the benchmarks and thresholds for existing measures based on updated data and performance trends across the industry. Agencies will need to stay informed about these changes and adapt their strategies accordingly.
- Enhanced Focus on Social Determinants of Health: As the healthcare industry increasingly recognizes the impact of social determinants of health (SDOH) on patient outcomes, CMS may incorporate measures that account for SDOH-related factors in performance evaluations.
- Technology Integration: CMS may place a greater emphasis on the use of technology and data analytics in care delivery, potentially introducing new measures related to telehealth, remote patient monitoring, or data-driven care coordination.
Agencies will need to prepare for these changes by staying informed, updating their practices, and investing in the necessary tools and resources to meet the new standards and continue succeeding in the VBP program.
Changes in healthcare policy can significantly impact CMS VBP strategies.
Updates in reimbursement models, shifts in quality measurement criteria, or modifications in regulatory requirements can necessitate adjustments in how agencies manage quality and performance. Staying proactive in monitoring policy trends and participating in healthcare forums can help agencies anticipate changes and adapt their strategies to maintain or improve their VBP performance.
McBee relays these updates as often as possible, but staying proactive in understanding these changes is key.
Advancements in technology play a significant role in supporting agencies to meet CMS VBP requirements.
Advanced electronic health records (EHRs) enhance accurate and timely documentation, telehealth services improve access and continuity of care, and data analytics tools facilitate performance monitoring and decision-making. These technologies help agencies optimize healthcare delivery and improve outcomes, which are essential for succeeding in the VBP program.
Excelling in CMS Value-Based Purchasing provides several long-term benefits for healthcare agencies, including higher reimbursement rates and financial bonuses that can be reinvested into the agency to further improve care quality. Additionally, high performance in VBP can enhance the agency’s reputation, attract more patients, and foster trust within the community.
Naturally, these benefits contribute to the sustainability and growth of the agency.
Never miss an update. Subscribe to our blog and get the top industry insights delivered right to your inbox.
